MOTHER'S AGENDA

Vol. 6

Contents

 

 

January 6, 1965
January 9, 1965
January 12, 1965
January 16, 1965
January 24, 1965
January 31, 1965
February 4, 1965
February 19, 1965
February 24, 1965
February 27, 1965


March 3, 1965
March 6, 1965
March 10, 1965
March 20, 1965
March 24, 1965

March 27, 1965


April 7, 1965
April 10, 1965
April 17, 1965
April 21, 1965
April 23, 1965
April 28, 1965
April 30, 1965


May 5, 1965
May 8, 1965
May 11, 1965
May 15, 1965
May 19, 1965
May 29, 1965

 

June 2, 1965

 

June 5, 1965
June 9, 1965

June 12, 1965
June 14, 1965

June 18, 1965
June 23, 1965
June 26, 1965
June 30, 1965

 

July 3, 1965
July 7, 1965
July 10, 1965
July 14, 1965
July 17, 1965
July 21, 1965
July 24, 1965
July 28, 1965
July 31, 1965


August 4, 1965
August 7, 1965
August 14, 1965
August 15, 1965
August 18, 1965
August 21, 1965
August 25, 1965
August 28, 1965
August 31, 1965

 

September 4, 1965
September 8, 1965
September 11, 1965
September 15, 1965
September 15, 1965

 

September 16, 1965

September 18, 1965
September 22, 1965
September 25, 1965

September 29, 1965

 

October 10, 1965
October 13, 1965
October 16, 1965
October 20, 1965
October 27, 1965
October 30, 1965


November 3, 1965
November 6, 1965
November 10, 1965
November 13, 1965
November 15, 1965
November 20, 1965
November 23, 1965
November 27, 1965
November 30, 1965


December 1, 1965
December 4, 1965
December 7, 1965
December 10, 1965
December 15, 1965
December 18, 1965
December 22, 1965
December 25, 1965
December 28, 1965
December 30, 1965
December 31, 1965


HOME

 

ISBN 2-902776-33-0

September 22, 1965

What's the next aphorism?

It's on silence.

Silence ... Oh, it's better to practice that than talk about it.

That's an experience I had here long ago: the difference between wanting immediately to spread and use what one has learnt, and, by contrast, the contact with higher knowledge in which one remains as still as possible so it may have a transforming effect.

We'll talk about it again another time.

The scientific mind is sure of its knowledge only if it is applied, put into practice, and if it yields useful results. That's what they call "knowledge" (!)

***

Have you read the report of the United Nations session?

Yes, about the cease-fire? [[The Security Council has issued an ultimatum to India and Pakistan for a ceasefire. ]]

I haven't read it: I have been told about it. But through certain

Page 250


 things, I have been put in contact, [[In inner contact with this organization. ]] and they seem to be a united expression of universal falsehood.

Their common ground is petty schemes and petty biases, preconceived and MICROSCOPIC ideas on the usefulness of divisions among countries so that no one country may dominate the others - nothing but absolutely superficial things, and completely false, moreover. And no sincerity, no mental honesty, no sincere goodwill - nothing. They decided in advance that Pakistan was right and India was wrong.

Unfortunately, those phantoms seem to strike terror into the people in Delhi.

Not quite. I have direct news from Delhi (Mother holds out a telegram): "I am deeply grateful says Shastri." That was following my message.

And in a Parliament session (I don't know if it was a Parliament session or a cabinet meeting), they were told that the true goal of India is to re-create the country's unity, and that the second goal is to give Tibet autonomy and independence. And that these are the two things India wants. And that, somehow or other, they will have to be.

Now, what are they going to do? I don't know.

That doesn't go very well with their "cease-fire" - they accept the cease-fire.

On condition that ... there is a condition. They accept on condition that Pakistan makes very serious pledges - which Pakistan refuses to make.

Yes, luckily! [[Satprem means: luckily. because if Pakistan behaved and didn't force India to fight, the partition might last a long time. ]]

Pledges of concord, of unity.

In any event, the voice [Mother's message] has been heard - heard and accepted in Delhi. Now, of course, there is the question of strength: will they be strong enough to ... But the point is established.

Page 251


(Satprem, in disbelief) It has entered their heads?

Not all of them. It's enough if they are two or three - there are more of them than that.

Page 252