September 29, 1962
(Concerning an old Talk of October 3, 1956, to be published in the next “Bulletin”:)
This is what you say:
“Beyond the shadow of a doubt, modern scientific perception comes much closer to expressing universal reality than, say, Stone Age perceptions did. Yet even science will suddenly find itself completely surpassed and probably turned upside down by the intrusion of something that DID NOT EXIST in the observed universe….”
The trouble is, Sri Aurobindo said the thing was INSIDE already, involved. He always says it’s “involved” and then evolves.
Yes, but “involved” simply means unmanifested. The intrusion of the new, supramental element is the intrusion of that involved, unmanifested element.
Page 358
If it weren’t already there, involved, it could never come out! That’s obvious.
Then you say:
“This change, this abrupt transformation of the universal element, will most certainly bring about a kind of chaos in the perceptions, from which a new knowledge will emerge. That, in the most general terms, is the result of the new Manifestation.”
It’s not a question of “new things,” as if they didn’t exist before, but they were unmanifested in the universe. Nothing can exist which doesn’t already exist in the Supreme from all eternity. But it is new in the Manifestation. The element isn’t new, but it is newly manifest, newly emerged from the Nonmanifest. Something “new” … what does that mean? It makes no sense! It is new FOR us, in the manifestation, that’s all.
We always talk nonsense when we speak. But at any rate (laughing), some nonsense is closer to the truth than other nonsense! This nonsense is closer to the truth.
Page 359